94
Fashion Jobs
CHANEL
Senior Business Finance Manager
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
CHANEL
Finance Manager
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
JCPENNEY
Quality Engineer
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
JCPENNEY
Quality Engineer
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
ADIDAS
Manager, Quality Product Integrity
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
TAPESTRY
Manager, Manufacturing Engineer
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
SPECIALIZED
Painting Quality Engineer - Bình Dương, Vietnam
Permanent ·
PUMA
Senior Executive Origin Logistics
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
PUMA
Senior Manager/Manager, Finance
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
L'OREAL GROUP
Corporate Affairs & Reputation Manager - Corporate Affairs & Engagement
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
PROCTER&GAMBLE
Plant IT Operations Specialist
Permanent · BẾN CÁT
PROCTER&GAMBLE
Medical Leader
Permanent · BẾN CÁT
PROCTER&GAMBLE
Sales Manager
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
PROCTER&GAMBLE
Senior Key Account Manager
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
PUMA
Senior Executive, Finance
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
PUMA
Key Account Manager, Marketplace E-Com
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
ON RUNNING
Head of Footwear Sourcing
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
ADIDAS
Director, Manufacturing Innovation - Advanced Materials
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
ON RUNNING
Head of Development & Engineering
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
L'OREAL GROUP
Key Account Executive - l’Oréal Dermatological Beauty
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
HENKEL
Safety, Health & Environment Network Head SEA
Permanent · BIEN HOA
COLUMBIA
Senior Corporate Responsibility Specialist
Permanent · HO CHI MINH CITY
Published
Jul 5, 2018
Reading time
2 minutes
Download
Download the article
Print
Text size

Ad watchdog calls for regulatory review of Goop for "deceptive" ads

Published
Jul 5, 2018

Nonprofit Truth In Advertising (Tina.org) has called out Goop's content for being deceptive and not routinely backed by scientific evidence despite claims suggesting that it is.


Tina.org calls for regulatory review of Goop for deceptive advertising - TruthInAdvertising.org


In a post on Tina.org's website this week, the advertising watchdog said Goop's disclaimers are inconspicuous, explaining "Most people miss them... and, legally speaking, they can’t cure a false claim — the false claim being that, regardless of how Goop wants to project itself to the world, the company does not possess the appropriate scientific evidence to support many of the health claims on its site."

Tina.org first called the lifestyle brand out last year when it sent a list of Goop's false scientific claims to two district attorneys in California. Goop subsequently updated its content accordingly, however Tina.org claims that it recently found 24 claims on the brand's site that are still deceptive. Accordingly, Tina.org has renewed its call for regulatory action with the district attorneys.

There are five specific disclaimers used on Goop indicating different levels of research behind products. These are "ancient modality," "supported by science," "rigorously tested," and "speculative but promising." The fifth, "for your enjoyment" is the only label that clearly states there are no scientific studies relating to a product, stating simply that "it's fun and there's real merit in that."

Tina.org explains, "While the majority of the disclaimers admit that the health claims on the site rest on shaky scientific ground, there’s one that suggests Goop really has no idea what it is talking about."

The disclaimers are part of a coding initiative Goop launched last month in order to to better classify its content. The brand's site is using the codes on an increasing number of its stories, but the labels are not universally applied, adding fuel to Tina.org's argument that Goop is practising deceptive advertising.

More information about the nonprofit's investigation into Goop's advertising practises can be found on the Tina.org website. 

Copyright © 2024 FashionNetwork.com All rights reserved.